![]() Users are thrilled to have access to the plugin with people sharing their tips on how to utilise them. The plugin can help with many of the common workflows of a data scientist including tools of visualisation, trend analysis and data transformation. With its availability on Beta mode, ChatGPT Plus users will get access to a plugin that might even make a data scientist obsolete. Really amazing for any data science use case: /Fd3SnPvVmT- Greg Brockman July 6, 2023 AppCode is usable again – really quite often.Code Interpreter becoming available for all ChatGPT Plus users over the next week. And depending on what you're doing, CI might get harder, so you might want to look into that.īut overall, it's been totally worth it. Also, if you're using Firebase, there's a bug you need to work around. It's not perfect: best to stay away from the "all_binary!" option, which just seems flaky. So you can get down into a dependency's code when you need to – for debugging or just better understanding – but you don't burden the IDE with all the source for all the dependencies all the time. Similarly to Carthage, it builds dependencies at install time and adds the binaries to your project.Ī nice thing about it (and it beats Carthage in this regard) is that it's simple to flip an individual pod from binary to source. The cocoapods-binary plugin has made the 50-pod project usable again in AppCode. If it works for you, Carthage is a good option, and you'll get the same performance gains as. Unfortunately, not all projects support Carthage – particularly older ones (which you can understand) and those from big vendors (who have no excuse). Carthage is also nice because it's less invasive – it fits into your project nicely rather than forcing a workspace upon you like Cocoapods does. With Carthage, dependencies are added to your project as binaries, not source – they're either pulled down already-built, or Carthage builds them during its equivalent of pod install. AppCode doesn't support Swift Package Manager yet. So, what to do about it? There are a couple of options. (Yes, that's too many dependencies, but quite a few are integrations that the client wants, and I don't have much choice about those.) That's a lot of extra code for the IDE to deal with. I'm currently working on a project that has 50 pods once you count all the transitive dependencies. ![]() If you stop and think about it, the code in your pods is probably many times the size of your project's main code. This has a big impact: indexing is much slower, and things like code completion have way more to deal with – and often grind to a halt. Pods are added to your project as source code – that means they're compiled as part of your project, but more importantly here, AppCode indexes all that extra code. If you have a lot of pods, it slows down AppCode a lot. When a company starts doing this sort of thing, you can't help worrying about the product's future.Ĭocoapods, as it turns out, slows down AppCode. Not all their product forums mind you – just the AppCode one. There have been many complaints on the public AppCode forum about glacial, unusable slowness, but they've repeatedly been met with "oh, it must be your particular situation – send us a copy of your project" – disingenuously ignoring that performance is bad for most projects, not just a few outliers. JetBrains seem to be in damage-control mode. until I miss the many things I like better about AppCode. Periodically, this madness drives me back to Xcode. When the wind it southerly, it knows a hawk from a handsaw. Or when the wind is blowing from the north. Slow enough to make you cry, but you know. You know what I'm talking about – it's slow. ![]() ![]() Instead, using it often feels like a peculiar form of masochism. It has so much potential to be great, but it reaches greatness all too rarely. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |